York Olympic Bar

This is FOX news: "gun crime is rare in Britain, and handguns are completely illegal. The ban is so strictly enforced that Britain Olympic pistol shooting team is prohibited exercise in its own country.

Great Britain, 46 homicides by firearms was the lowest total since the late 1980s. New York City, with 8 million against 53 million people in England and Wales, recorded at least 579 homicides last year. " http://www.foxnews.com/story/0, 2933.2665 ...

Is this not prove that you live in complete denial and have not one leg up? If not, please provide your proof that everyone having a gun would result in fewer homicides and also show why the banning of guns does not work, they are prohibited in the United Kingdom and it is working. Thank you.

Here is an excellent example:

"On January 16, 2002, the dean, Anthony Sutin, Professor Thomas Blackwell and student Angela Dales were slain by disgruntled student Peter Odighizuwa, 43, of Nigeria. Three other students were shot but survived. The abrupt ending Odighizuwa Shooting Spree is attributed to two students with firearms staff took quick action. "

British police also tend to fudge their facts to give the impression that things are going their way, much like CNN.

If handguns were banned, the criminals do not have. Law abiding people should have the right to defend itself. Disputes that boy bedwetting is liberal Mummy!

January Yasidro, Columbine Cafe fads, all the victims were unarmed. Auschwitz, Dachau, ask the Jewish survivors that the first act was against them, he was disarmed. The guns are there, they will not disappear, they come to our borders every day. Have you heard the report mentions that the Brit Bobbies armed struggle to become? They discover Jamacan communities in the North are well armed with shotguns and high-end weapons of war coming from everywhere. Only the rich can own firearms in Brittan, if you follow the law. You should review your questions a bit first refusal, an armed society is a polite society.

The United States and the United Kingdom are two totally different places.

Here in the U.S. it has been proven time and again that when you start to ban weapons, violent crimes and deaths in the general population started to rise. Any reduction in the short term are largely offset by marked increases dramatically and in subsequent years.

Now, FYI, over the last two years, violent crime and murders have been increasing in the United Kingdom. There was a 14% increase in the rate of violent crime. Nearly 43% of all crimes committed in the United Kingdom are now violent crimes.

There are causes of infant mortality increasingly deadly female per capita in the United Kingdom than anywhere else in the world.

The error is in those states, 1. The Swiss like a national mandate that all homes have a firearm, the national defense. 2. The comments about England are the ownership of legal firearms. They make no mention of illegal firearms be made and used in England. There are more calls to British police to be armed than ever, because of increased crime rate. We could ban and collect all the registered firearms in this country, but how can we get the memories of war or those who-grandfather, before registration? How old trunks in attics are having a gun in it, everyone had forgotten? The confiscation of firearms will be, as the ban was an encouragement to illegality.

Life in the United States is not the same as life in the United Kingdom. Criminals here would like the public to be totally disarmed. Do you honestly believe that criminals would.